|
02.15
2009 by Eric in bike ride tags : bike, davis leave a comment |
Tour of California stage 1 in Davis…fast and wetWind, rain, cold, and wet, slippery: I felt almost sorry for the guys biking at 30 mph with this bad weather. However, it is kind of cool having the start of the tour of California in Davis. So we hang out a little, outside Wheelworks downtown to see the guys warming up and racing a couple of laps around the blocks. Well, those guys are dam fast with their top-notch bikes: impressive! My bike, Bullitt, doesn’t like having wet tires…. too bad, I’m sure she would have love racing a little with those rookies, especially with Lance A. |
|
01.05
2009 by Eric in science tags : publication leave a comment |
Got peer-reviewed scientific publications ?I’ve always wondering what is the ratio of peer-reviewed scientific publications that just bring nothing really new to the field. Also, what could be the ratio of fake data being published every year? Those questions have been bugging me for the last couple of weeks. Ok, I don’t pretend that my papers are among the greatest ever published, however, the data I present are genuine and I always try to have a thorough analysis of a given question. I’m writing this, because lately I came across a lot of papers that just garbage inaccurate to me. In no specific order, it can be: recycling old data into new one, controls experiments are missing or inaccurate, data too perfect to be true, writing a whole paper with experiments that just bring nothing new to the field, among others…. There is so many journals out there that it is somewhat easy to get a paper publish. If it failed to one journal, we just have to send it to another journal with a slightly lower impact factor. Even if in general, a correlation exists between impact factor and quality however, high impact factor journals are not immune of bad papers. Nowadays, it is so tough to get funded that it had raised the bar very high in term of publications. A PI and a lab have to produce a lot of papers. Unfortunately it tends to seriously impact the quality, enhance the tendency of over-interpreting the data or fake them. I think the whole thing is definitively not moving in the right direction and that’s made me sad/angry. |
|
12.31
2008 by Eric in greetings ! tags : happy new year leave a comment |
’08 is almost gone…Yeah ! to 2009I wish you all the very best for 2009. Things to do : Party plenty, work plenty, stay focus plenty, have fun plenty, love plenty, give plenty, enjoy life plenty, keep an open mind and don’t take things too much seriously… |
|
12.31
2008 by Eric in greetings ! tags : happy new year leave a comment |
My 2009 New Year’s Resolutions
|
|
12.16
2008 by Eric in flight tags : flight, plane leave a comment |
The king of speedHere a great story (after the jump) which has been around for a while. Is-it a true story ? It sounds plausible. However, a similar thing happened to me a while back when I was a student pilot flying cross-country in a C152. My instructor asked Air Traffic Controllers (ATC) a groundspeed check in order to cross-checked my calculations. Right after ATC replied, a guy flying a much faster plane with a million bucks avionics in it (King-Air) including accurate groundspeed asked ATC a groundspeed check. Come-on ! Wanna play this game ? ok…
|
|
12.09
2008 by Eric in flight tags : flight, x-plane leave a comment |
Barrel roll and other little pleasureThe winter weather is definitively upon us. We have this very thick fog everyday, a high humidity level, low temperature and bad visibility. Most of the planes are grounded, no flights, no fun…borring. Well, in some sense, that’s good because I have a lot of work to do, proposals to write, refine, perfect and articles to finish and very little time for anything else. How can I treat myself with this rush of adrenaline I get when I am on short final for a tricky crosswind landing and wondering if I should throttle up to max power and abort the landing ? X-plane 9 an ultra realistic flight simulator (sic) is here to help. I purchased it few weeks ago when I was wandering at the Apple store at Arden Fair Mall. Before starting flying real planes I was ok with simulators like “Microsoft Flight simulator”, it was fun. But now I don’t like it anymore because it feels and reacts weird/not right. I might be picky on that one. However, I have to say that I’m having a blast with X-Plane 9. It is fairly realistic and I have pretty much the same feeling flying the real C172. It is just few settings/adjustments away from being almost perfect on how the plane reacts. The program relies on the blade element theory, which uses fine descriptions of specific airfoils to do real time computations on lift/drag for instance. Other simulators use lookup tables to get the lift and drag for a given flight condition. There are numerous settings to play with and can also get the real-time weather. X-plane automatically download METAR files and translated them into very realistic weather conditions. The graphics are also really nice and it comes with over 80% of the world terrain on 6 DVD. That’s a hefty 70Gb after installation….The source code of the program seems to be optimized but you still need a good machine with a kick-ass GPU fully loaded with RAM to get most of the awesome graphics. It runs great and smoothly at a native resolution on my 07′ MacbookPro 2.4Ghz 4Gb/GF 8600M GT 256Mb. It uses around 1.5Gb of RAM and almost all the GPU Ram at the default settings. Sometimes FPS dropped below 20fps in VFR conditions with 25+ miles visibility with lot of terrains, trees and some clouds. Other than that, it runs great. See Ya ! I’m going back to X-plane. I’m trying to get off the ground with a hefty Cessna 152 in Telluride, CO (9,078 feet above sea level) with 35C outside air temperature … I have this gut feeling it’s not going to be pretty |



























